swalker
New Member
I have made 3 posts
Right now I'm Offline
I joined March 2016
My gender is Female
|
Post by swalker on Mar 24, 2016 19:25:37 GMT
One of the main criticisms of cyberutopia is its intertwining interactions with face to face feminisms, and the refusal to see online interactions as affecting or potentially conflicting with offline interactions (Brophy, 2010 Pg 932). Is it possible that Brophy is essentializing the problem of separate or non-separate spaces a bit more than she needs to? After all, the separation of the internet from lived feminist experiences allows for the potential of distance between dissenting voices and the pressure they might feel to conform to the dominant opinion; something that is difficult to do in the offline world. How might online feminisms develop voices which are too frequently silenced in offline interactions, and is this a critique of Brophy's problematized cyberutopia?
|
|
whitney
New Member
I have made 7 posts
Right now I'm Offline
I joined March 2016
My gender is Female
|
Post by whitney on Mar 24, 2016 21:09:04 GMT
The term, "Cyberutopia" has a built in assumption. With that, it does not account for several possibilities that could be negative or conflicting. Utopian thinkers aren't really accounting for the negative, because they are trying to create a "utopian" environment. I think feminist voices are easily cultivated online, but is it possible, as in all dichotomous positions that silencing exists online as well? There are both virtual and real life consequences attached to any interaction on or offline, in my opinion.
|
|